3
Points
I don't think the mild semantic benefits of the switch are worth the "transaction costs".
I am mildly opposed, on the argument that change is confusing and should be avoided unless necessary. People are going to look at old code and say, "What is all this 'gas' referred to?" Veterans are going to keep calling it gas out of habit, confusing newcomers. I don't think the mild semantic benefits of the switch are worth the "transaction costs".
Added one year ago by Martin
1
Counter-Argument